Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comicraft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 23:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Comicraft

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Possible merge/redirect to Richard Starkings? Boleyn (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:27, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - won several Eisner Awards, the most prestigious award the comic industry offers. The company was profiled in several print sources in the 1990s, and continues to receive modern coverage. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:03, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:GNG so far as I can tell. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 14:21, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. I believe the reference by is good and counts towards establishing notability. There appears to be a number of books which have a profile on this company and although I have to date been unable to get access to the books in question, I believe this company is recognised as notable in its specific field.  HighKing++ 19:29, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.