Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comics Curmudgeon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was nomination withdrawn. - Mailer Diablo 15:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Comics Curmudgeon
nn comic book blog, fails WP:WEB, alexa of 2,361,475 Giant onehead 03:43, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep 335,000 GHits, which seem mostly appropriate. Admittedly, they seem to almost all be other blogs, but I still think it rolls over the notability line. - Richfife 04:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I really don't think that's a very valid or convincing reason for a keep vote, check this search with the site name and the bloggers name, gets 110 unique hits, hope that convinces more. Giant onehead 04:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I disagree. Tomato, tomahto, I guess. - Richfife 04:55, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Well then you must be completely retarded then. Giant onehead 05:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks for sharing! - Richfife 05:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, notable as a critic within the comics community. Alexa Rank of the older URL joshreads.com is 58,594, which is pretty good for a blog. I found a couple of independent media mentions. And Giant onehead, please remain civil. --Dhartung | Talk 06:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment You know something, screw it, I withdraw the nomination. If you want this crap to flood WP, then be my guest. Giant onehead 06:17, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'm no fan of blogs (as subject of Wikipedia articles at least), but as fas as they go, this one is noteworthy. Has apparently been a Yahoo pick of the day, author is a recognised authority in the comics world (e.g. he was asked for a podcast on this forum, he is a contributor to ITworld.com, he is referenced on Daily Cartoonist, ...). Fram 14:28, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, article does not meet WP:WEB. Needs verifiable information from reliable sources. -- Dragonfiend 22:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, this blogger has been quite successful Subwayguy 00:16, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.