Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comics for Tomorrow Today! (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —  Aitias  // discussion 03:10, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Comics for Tomorrow Today!
NOTE: THE LAST FIVE ARTICLES HAVE NOT BEEN DISCUSSED BEFORE --Punkmorten (talk) 17:18, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously nominated cluster of articles about Kablam! episodes which resulted in a delete all decision and a merger decision for some of the episode details in the List of KaBlam! episodes article, they've been recreated and still have the same issues of unconfirmed episode details using TV.com articles, fair-use screencap violations, and an extremely superflous use of the Nicktoons template by an editor who doesn't seem to understand what AfD decisions result in.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 07:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Additional nominations within this AfD;

NOTE: THE LAST FIVE ARTICLES HAVE NOT BEEN DISCUSSED BEFORE --Punkmorten (talk) 17:18, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete db-repost. JuJube (talk) 08:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Recreation of deleted material that does nothing to address the cause of deletion.  Graymornings (talk) 08:16, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: per JuJube and  Graymornings . -- Oliver Twisted  (Talk)  08:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all as non-notable episodes, no secondary sources. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete all, that is the five that weren't G4'd. I have reason to believe that they are not any different from those already deleted, so common sense tells us that they probably shouldn't be here, either. Otherwise, these episodes are clearly non-notable as their own articles. Also, very borderline speedy deletion as all copyvios (G12); all the information is almost entirely ripped from tv.com (while not verbatim, but in style and structure). MuZemike  ( talk ) 18:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete the remaining five articles for reasons similar to User:TenPoundHammer. HeureusementIci (talk) 21:13, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete the last five, too. Similar to other material; just like the ones we deleted, these articles can't stand on their own.  Graymornings (talk) 21:19, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete All - fails WP:EPISODES Mayalld (talk) 07:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.