Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comintelli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 05:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Comintelli

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article for non-notable company. the article makes a good deal of the "promise award" -- but it's an award for potential, not accomplishments, the candidates can nominate themselves for it, and there are quite a number of finalists each year. The other awards are similar. At best, not yet notable.  DGG ( talk ) 18:50, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  05:52, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete: I am finding only routine announcements for this firm (and for its previous name, "Comintell"). That leaves the question whether their repeat appearances on "promise and "trend-setter" lists at Knowledge Management World, and as one of seven firms with a 2010 award from Basex (whose site throws various 404s on "About Basex" etc) amounts to WP:CORPDEPTH notability; I would say they fall short. AllyD (talk) 08:02, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  03:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - I see some notability in the fact that the firm seems to be established. New is not the same as non-notable.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - software company article of unclear notability, lacking significant coverage in reliable sources. The AnalystTechnologies ref doesn't appear to meet RS, and the Social Information Group pdf is a deadlink, leaving only the minor awards, which are not sufficient to establish notability. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 10:21, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.