Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comiso Airport Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nobody who is not a sockpuppet or a banned user has argued for the article to be kept. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  22:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Comiso Airport Company

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Management company of Comiso Airport is not independently notable from the airport itself. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 02:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment:I was canceled your changes, to show you that you are wrong, look at this page: In Italy, as in the whole world, every airport is subject to management by a company, it is obvious. I really don't understand how you can open a discussion. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Airport_operators_of_Italy, if you see the italian wiki: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categoria:Societ%C3%A0_di_gestione_aeroportuale_d%27Italia you can even find 20 Airport operators.

The fact that the company has a section on the airport site and not a separate site does not mean anything, also because the data is essential. See: Business name: SO.A.CO. S.p.A. – Società dell'aeroporto di Comiso Registered office: Piazza Fonte Diana s.n. – 97013 Comiso (RG) VAT identification number: 01083290880 Share capital: 4.200.000 euro (in the article it says)

The airport is a state property, the company that manages (Airport operator) it is another thing, but this is so obvious that i think you are confused with other articles. As you can see from the logo in this PDF, SOACO is one thing (stazione appaltante or contracting authority), the airport is another thing:https://aeroportodicomiso.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Avviso_a_manifestare_interesse_1.pdf --Pasionpalau (talk) 05:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  11:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, I would like to point out that the article was created by a globally blocked long-term abuser (Sonny Solina), and Pasionpalau is one of his many socks that I asked for a block on meta. I don't know the en.wiki policies, I think his comments should be deleted. Sorry for my little English. Greetings, --Mtarch11 (talk) 11:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The meta request can be seen at this link. EdJohnston (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * keep is a private company that manages the structure as in all airports--87.0.170.158 (talk) 08:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC) Striking vote by blocked sockpuppet. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 04:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi and, just letting you know that this IP address has a similar edit history to the socks of User:Sonny Solina. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 22:27, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Of course, it is always he who continues to create other socks (see) --Mtarch11 (talk) 02:27, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Just a standard run-of-the-mill management company that so happens to manage an airport. No indications of notability and no references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails NCORP/GNG  HighKing++ 15:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * question The te are other 4 identical pages, we delete all: Aeroporti di Roma, Aeroporto Friuli Venezia Giulia (company), Società Azionaria Gestione Aeroporto Torino and Toscana Aeroporti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.160.168.30 (talk) 11:02, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.