Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ComixTalk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

ComixTalk
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Some concerns were raised here about both the site's reputability (no editorial policy) and notability. Searching both under the current and former names, I have found absolutely no secondary, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. While there are some notable names that contribute to the site, and while it certainly has been around a long time in Web years, it has utterly failed to assert notability through reliable third-party coverage. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as insufficiently notable per the WP:GNG. I know this will upset some editors, but my opinion is that Wikipedia should remain fairly discriminating and cover only those subjects that are "part of the enduring historical record." If ComixTalk has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," then it should not have an article here. — Satori Son 18:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete can't find evidence of significant coverage . LibStar (talk) 01:42, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that it doesn't seem to meet the notabilty guideline for websites. ScottyBerg (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.