Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comm100


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Comm100

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable company, article created by User:Sabrina_Gage. Her LinkedIn says she works at Comm100: Rchard2scout (talk) 17:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete due to the undisclosed conflict of interest by the article's creator, discovered by Rchard2scout. Also, coverage on Google News is nothing but company press releases.  No coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the company itself.  Therefore, not notable. Cullen328 (talk) 18:58, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The conflict of interest alone is not reason enough for deletion. However, when there are no reliable sources readily available, and the COI is undisclosed, that creates in a strong presumption toward deletion in my mind, as the prospects for true encyclopedic coverage are poor at best. Cullen328 (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Advert. (LinkedIn lists her as a "Marketer"). Lack of anything on gnews outside of press releases indicates this is not a notable company. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 03:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.