Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Command information newspaper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. after article expansion and improvement. Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Command information newspaper

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This really exists (type of internal publication within the US military), but it is questionable if it is notable. While various reliable sources mention it in passing (while discussing something said in some particular issue of one of these), I can't find any significant coverage of the concept in itself. Wikipedia is not a repository of all the internal minutiae of how the US military (or any other military in the world) works. PROD contested by User:Kvng SomethingForDeletion (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so Soft Deletion is not an option. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, Military,  and United States of America. SomethingForDeletion (talk) 21:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete absence of sources and lack of coverage makes it unready for mainspace. Based Kashmiri  TALK  10:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment is a soft redirect to Wiktionary an option here? This is just a definition, and there is no evidence that will change. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:51, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Currently, there is no Wiktionary entry for "command information newspaper". Of course, you (or anybody else) could always create one. However, that Wiktionary entry might then be subject to Wiktionary's own review processes to determine whether its inclusion is appropriate. I think it is a bit problematic creating a soft redirect to a Wiktionary entry which doesn't currently exist, and I don't know whether under Wiktionary's own inclusion criteria it would accepted. (My undereducated guess is they probably would decide to keep, but I don't think we should presume that here.) SomethingForDeletion (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG and WP:HEY. Article has been expanded and several sources have been added. Most compelling coverage in independent secondary sources include this 2005 opinion piece in Newsday, "Truth is first casualty of war reporting", which describes the command information newspaper Observer during the Vietnam War, and this 1990 article in The Leaf-Chronicle, "101st Media Personnel To Produce Information Newspaper For Troops", which looks at command information newspapers produced by the 101st Airborne Division during three wars (World War II, Vietnam War, Operation Desert Shield). Ping. Cielquiparle (talk) 11:15, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements and sources added by . Thank you! ~Kvng (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.