Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commercial Vehicle Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:11, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Commercial Vehicle Group

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Appears to fail WP:NCORP. Very little coverage of any kind outside of PR Newswire and other press release websites, article currently has zero citations.  always forever  (talk) 06:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:10, 18 November 2021 (UTC) Keep. Hi everyone, I am a marketing intern for CVG. I was unaware of our page not upholding guidelines. I would like to request it not be deleted so I may have some time to improve it to standard. I am currently working on collecting articles, references, and more information to improve this page. I would greatly appreciate your help, but understand if it is not possible. Thank you so much, --MarketingInternCVGRP (talk) 03:52, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  always forever  (talk)  06:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  always forever  (talk)  06:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  always forever  (talk)  06:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions.  always forever  (talk)  06:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. I had prodded this under a similar justification about five minutes before made this nomination, and I do not believe that there exists sufficient coverage that passes both WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH for this to be notable. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please do not forget to disclose your COI. And I'm also not sure if your vote counts because you are associated with the subject.  Waddles  Gobbles 🍂 🦃 03:58, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The user was blocked. SL93 (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  03:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. There's no WP:SIGCOV outside the PRs, and the COI editor who voted keep never improved the article.  Waddles  Gobbles 🍂 🦃 03:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:COI concerns aside, this does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. -- Kinu <i style="color: red">t</i>/<i style="color:red">c</i> 02:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.