Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commissioner v. Boylston Market Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. --Tikiwont (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Commissioner v. Boylston Market Association

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

lawsuit... i did a google search and I was only able to get 5 g-hits. maybe some sources to show that this is a notable case, it could be kept... Law/Disorder 01:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability. Did the case generate significant media coverage?  Has it been widely cited in other rulings?  Absent anything like that, it's not notable.  --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 04:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per BlueMoonlet, without some synthesis, putting the case's impact into a context, there can be no claim of notability. Pete.Hurd 04:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: No sources, and no notability that I can find. - Rjd0060 05:09, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.