Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee (designer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200  (talk &#124; ctrb) 01:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Committee (designer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * You need to search for the two designers' names to find more coverage (as their brand name is hopelessly unimaginative). More coverage exists in specialized magazines (e.g. Metropolis) and books . Not sure how notable that makes them. After more searching I'd say weak delete, because there isn't much more coverage and it's all about one expo/item. Someone not using his real name (talk) 05:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 11:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.