Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee (designer) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Committee (designer)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One good source but do not otherwise appear to be notable. Prev discussion closed as no consensus despite two delete votes and no keeps. Further discussion required. Philafrenzy (talk) 14:50, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - the misguided close aside, this one is difficult because searching for "Committee" brings up millions of results, none of which relate to the subject. That said, I tried more specific search parameters and couldn't find anything there either. Support deletion unless notability can be substantiated by company-specific coverage in reliable sources. Stalwart 111  00:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - also couldn't find any notable coverage of subject, so it doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. mikeman67 (talk) 02:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.