Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Committee for International Peace (CIP)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was deleted. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  07:15, Feb. 11, 2006

Committee for International Peace (CIP)
Non-notable campus group Wkdewey 04:12, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete . Non-notable.  They are no different than any such club at any university.  And their main page is on MySpace... come on.  --Kinu 04:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete after vandalism by 68.192.15.169, who is an anonymous editor of this article, to my user page. If you have voted delete on this issue, you should check your user page as well. --Kinu 03:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Kinu. --Aaron 04:28, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity. EdGl 04:38, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 07:03, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Deleteunless evidence of notablitiy can be estabished.
 * Keep. There seems to be some evidence of a level of notability (they are mentioned in an article in the north texus daily) so I think it should be kept for now.--JK the unwise 11:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom Prodego  talk  14:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Kinu. -feydey 18:04, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Do not delete, Entry has been expanded. --CIP 21:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nomination. --Wingsandsword 09:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * keep. -- Waveguy 07:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * KEEP. I found several articles on them — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.150.236.125 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per nom.--み使い Mitsukai 01:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Entry has been expanded. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  09:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 10:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.