Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common Tasks for Assessment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Common Tasks for Assessment

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only one source (no longer present). This article's topic doesn't seem notable to me. DarklitShadow (talk) 01:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and South Africa. DarklitShadow (talk) 01:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Unless further sources can be found, I'd suggest deletion. StarryNightSky11 ☎ 02:10, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Doesn't seem to have any other sources. Google search.
 * DarklitShadow (talk) 19:04, 31 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is an important process in education in South Africa with a similar status to the British Eleven-plus exam (although it not actually an exam).  Numerous books on South African education cover it,
 * Transforming Assessment
 * Exploring Mathematics and Science Teachers' Knowledge
 * Educator Workload in South Africa
 * SpinningSpark 22:14, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... is it worthwhile to merge with Education in South Africa?
 * DarklitShadow (talk) 22:54, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - This needs cleanup but I think there are enough sources to pass GNG. On top of those provided already, I have also found this article from Educational Studies in Mathematics and this (both by the same author and I think reporting the same/a similar study). Ideally I would like to find additional sources but this is, as notes, an important part of the South African education system, for which additional reliable sources likely exist; we shouldn't ignore that fact that due to systematic bias they may be more difficult to find. WJ94 (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep There are many sources in Gscholar from South African peer-reviewed journals, I'd say it's at GNG. Not much from international sources, but it exists and has critical discussion around the tasks and outcomes it gives. Oaktree b (talk) 02:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.