Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common smash


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Yank sox 00:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Common smash

 * — (View AfD)

The concept clearly exists, but the name, as far as I can tell, doesn't: a simple Google search for "common smash" turns up no results used in this context, or indeed many results that use "common smash" as a phrase at all. Unint 20:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete blatant original research. Guy (Help!) 21:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sources at all, and it's probably fake, so delete. Jayden54 22:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but how do we know the difference between a common smash and an uncommon smash? Oh, wait, both are original research.  Delete.  --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 22:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hulk Smash (Delete) per nom. Danny Lilithborne 23:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any verification that this term is used by music fans or critics. --Metropolitan90 04:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Googling Common Smash in quotes turns up the wikipedia page, and a bunch of pages using the term in a completely different way. It's not "original research," though, it's just making a term up and hoping it catches on.  At least research has sources.  71.197.131.165 05:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or move Neologism. Possibly move and source if we can find a mainstream term for it.  If kept, add YMCA to the list.--158.130.13.4 18:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.