Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common year where year divided by 4 has a remainder of 1


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:32, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Common year where year divided by 4 has a remainder of 1

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. This topic fails the GNG since it has not been the topic of coverage in reliable sources. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related page, for the same reasons:

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:17, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete both. Utterly trivial example of a modulo operation. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:36, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. BlueMoon65625 (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, clearly not notable. Just a trivial operation in mathematics. SunDawn (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Its.Trei (talk) 05:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete arbitrary formula for grouping years, with no source based evidence of notability.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 06:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - utter nonsense (not as in the content is nonsensical, but it's nonsense to have an article that essentially says nothing other than "some numbers when divided by 4 give remainder 1") -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete  - just an arbitrary grouping of years. If one analysed the mathematics of years, one could probably find dozens of ways in which the years are linked by a common factor, but the vast majority of these would probably not be notable enough to be included in an encyclopaedia. Rollo August (talk) 09:56, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - not even sure articles themselves indicate why subjects are notable, but doesn't pass GNG or any kind of notability for lists. WikiVirusC (talk) 13:07, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment There's also this Articles for deletion/Even-numbered common year in case anyone's interested; nommed as separate AfD as this one already had several !votes. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - even as an enthusiastic lifelong teacher of mathematics, I would say that this isn't notable Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:09, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Both articles violates WP:INDISCRIMINATE fails and WP:GNG. We don't even need an article for numbers that are congruent to 1 or 3 modulo 4, let alone years. — MarkH21talk 19:36, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. It does not make any sense how this could possibly be a relevant subject for an article. jp×g 04:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. jp×g 04:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Arbitrary list. Egsan Bacon (talk) 05:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete both, no clear indication why this bit of modular arithmetic is important in calendar lore. —Kusma (t·c) 08:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: coverage is weak and reliable sources not found. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 06:18, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete both: Very trivial and has no references. It also doesn't go with the norm. SVcode ( Talk ) 13:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.