Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commonly Accepted Rules and Terms Of "Dibs"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete per WP:SNOW, WP:OR, WP:FORK, and WP:HOWTO. Bearian (talk) 18:53, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Commonly Accepted Rules and Terms Of "Dibs"

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD; per WP:NOTHOWTO - simply instructions for playing a game.  Theo polisme  22:18, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:OR and a content fork of Dibs. There is no verifiable information to merge, and the title isn't worth a redirect. I would welcome a "Rules" section in the Dibs article, but the content can't come from here. Braincricket (talk) 03:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as something made up in one day. I'm not sure how I feel that this is also a content fork of Dibs. Depressed at the depths to which The Project is falling, I suppose. Carrite (talk) 04:31, 3 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing more to add than the above. --JetBlast (talk) 09:13, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 20:12, 3 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide, and the title is not worth a redirect. CtP  (t • c) 15:00, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.