Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commonweal Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Commonweal Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There is no evidence of notability. Although there appear at a glance to be numerous references, they almost all suffer from one or more problems such as: no mention of the subject; only indirect mention of it, (e.g a person mentioned in the source is just stated to be connected to this institute); not independent source; only very minor coverage; do not support the statemnets to which they are attached. (Note: The article was written by an editor with a clear conflict of interest. It has been tagged for over two years for various problems, such as needing proper third party references, being an unpublished synthesis, containing inappropriate citations which do not verify the text, being of questionable notability, etc.) JamesBWatson (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, list of references is misleading. No establishment of notability.--JayJasper (talk) 22:38, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.