Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commonwealth Labour Party (Bahamas)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No participation in 2 relists. (non-admin closure) – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 03:33, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Commonwealth Labour Party (Bahamas)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Minor party which contested one election in 1972 and received 0.5% of the vote. Fails WP:NORG. AusLondonder (talk) 23:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 3 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:44, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The party held a seat in the House of Assembly (which it lost in the 1972 elections), and I think any party that held a seat in a national legislature has inherent notability. I've made a small expansion to the article. Cheers, Number   5  7  09:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Alternatively, it may be the case that this was a rebranding of the Labour Party (this source describes the CLP as being "reconstituted"), in which case the two articles could be merged, although I'm not sure under which title. Number   5  7  12:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 18:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 18:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 18:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Contrary to what was said above, there is no criteria that awards a political party inherent notability; political parties fall under WP:NORG, which explicitly states "". Almost no sources seem to exist; party likely fails WP:GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 21:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't say there was any criteria that awards the party notability – it should be quite clear that I'm giving a personal view on the matter. Number   5  7  22:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.