Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commonwealth of New Island


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   -- Cirt (talk) 00:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC) delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:56, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Commonwealth of New Island

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable fictional place. All references are from the official website. Borderline spam. PROD contested (simply removed without comment) by original author. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:32, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article only has a single website as its reference (link). This article would qualify for speedy deletion.-- Lester  05:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I go against this Deletion, New Island is noted on may other sites of the web like here, here and here, but only information is from the official site. New Island need an article for the group of people that are it's fans, like me, to see it on Wikipedia, not to use is as a fan page. Please keep New Island on Wikipedia!--Gimelthedog (talk) 21:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This is not a fan page!!!--Gimelthedog (talk) 01:28, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * And just why do its fans need to see something on Wikipedia? To give yourselves some sort of credibility? Sorry, this isn't the place. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per Notability (fiction). This article is written almost entirely from a fictional perspective and contains no indication of why this might be a topic notable to the real world. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It is fiction because it is a Fictional Country!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gimelthedog (talk • contribs)
 * But it's not presented as such. And it's not even notable fiction. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:55, 12 September 2010 (UTC)


 * You Guys are all crazy, Wikipedia is place for knowledge, this is knowledge that is interesting to the public, that's why I posted here, I am very mad at all of you.--Gimelthedog (talk) 00:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.