Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commtel Networks (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Commtel Networks
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks like this article was already deleted very recently for notability issues, so I'm presuming the same still applies. CorporateM (Talk) 17:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG. Sources offered are all links to the company website, interviews with their executives (both WP:PRIMARY) and routine coverage of their press releases.  None of this comes close to what is required.  Msnicki (talk) 00:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Same issues as before it seems. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  02:43, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - None of the sources I found are actually usable, issues quite similar to those as mentioned in the deletion log, fails WP:NCORP. hmssolent \You rang? ship's log 04:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No evdence of notability (being a local reseller doesn't inherit). Press coverage is routine; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 05:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above Misscric indi (talk) 02:40, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing strong WP:SIGCOV and borderline WP:ADVERT considering it fall short of many points at WP:CORP. Mkdw talk 05:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.