Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Commune (designers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  13:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Commune (designers)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is merely a piece of corporate spam, profile made with references, not significant or not match to wikipedia standards. Use of this article is promotions alone. Light2021 (talk) 18:11, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:29, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- WP:PROMO on an unremarkable organisation. Nothing encyclopedically relevant here. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:16, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although it pains me to say so, somewhere under this pile of promotional puffery is a design firm with significant credits, coverage, and a major prize.  --Lockley (talk) 06:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:PROMO is part of WP:NOT, which is a policy. Notability is just a guideline. We don't need to accept promotional articles because of marginal notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:36, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. as promotional. We don't publish adbvertising, regadlesso f whether or not the company is notable  DGG ( talk ) 16:12, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'll admit I didn't invest a lot of effort in research, but a spot check of the references in the article didn't find a single one that convinced me this meets WP:N.  -- RoySmith (talk) 12:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:PROMO.   Dr Strauss   talk   13:11, 14 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.