Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CommuniMed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

CommuniMed

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

NN-software. Doesn't describe how the software meets the notability guidelines, and a quick gnews search had no hits. Prod placed by another editor was declined by a new account. Syrthiss (talk) 17:31, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 13:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment The text here is worded near-identically to the first paragraph of OpenEMR. Not in itself grounds to delete of course, but an additional concern in the absence of any references on this page. AllyD (talk) 18:35, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - It appears to serve only as an advertisement or public awareness piece. -- WikHead (talk) 23:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: I found no significant coverage in reliable sources independent of topic. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 13:51, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment There is a Canadian [Communimed] but it appears to be a distinct firm from this Brazilian CommuniMed. AllyD (talk) 08:13, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. AllyD (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.