Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communication, Culture & Technology Program


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Communication, Culture & Technology Program

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This was originally PROD'd for other reasons, but one of which I believe still applies: This is still the case. The sources are not sufficiently independent of the subject or primarilly third party. The only sources given are either WP:PRIMARY, or irrelevent (e.g. , , , do not mention the subject at all or purely peripherally), are not reliable (e.g. ), or are self-sourced. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Most of the article can be placed in the parent article; whatever is left is an advert for a particular course. Which as the original PROder notes, is not notabe in itself. O Fortuna! ...Imperatrix mundi.  15:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, borderline G11. Cabayi (talk) 07:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.