Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communication in Mediation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 01:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Communication in Mediation
Appears to be original research. The topic doesn't seem particularly encyclopedic, and Mediation already covers the relevant portions in a less essayish style. Shimeru 10:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following articles by the same author for deletion, for the same reasons:
 * Mediation Confidentiality
 * Mediation as an Alternative to the Legal System}} Shimeru 10:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as nom. See also the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medition: The roles and functions of Legal Representatives in Mediation where deletion of several similar articles is currently being discussed.  Emeraude 10:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment A look at the Mediation article shows that several other articles are proposed for that as well, I recommend all of these be added as well. What content should or should not be kept is another matter, though it may be very little.  Maybe we should also check the rest of Tashacromp's contribs as well FrozenPurpleCube 15:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment The proposed-merge articles in question are Responsibilities Regarding Confidentiality in Mediation, The Uses of Mediation in Preventing Conflicts, and Legal Implications of Mediated Agreements, all by a different username, Trentw. The style is identical, though, which makes me think it's either a second account held by Tashacromp, or that these are all copyvios from somewhere (which I'll be looking into in a moment).  Tashacromp's only other contribution is Physical Environment in Mediation, which I could see as a valid subarticle of the general Mediation article.  I'm uncertain what the protocol is as far as adding any of these to the AfD at this point, though. Shimeru 21:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * They don't appear to be copyvios -- at least not of an online source. Don't have access to Lexis at the moment to check further.  Shimeru 21:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge anything worth saving into the main Mediation article, which in its current form is spammy, badly formatted, and not very good. I may try to work on that later. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:20, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Bobet 21:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 13:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.