Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communications Wireless Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Courcelles (talk) 03:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Communications Wireless Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete'. As much as I support the work that the company does and the article is well referenced it does not seem to reach notability guidelines. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:38, 5 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a business that recycles old cellular phones.  The references provided are about the general issues regarding the recycling of phones, rather than this business in particular. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - That's not really true. The links from LiveScience, TWICE, and Mother Nature Network are all about the company, or feature it prominently. Reasonably meets WP standards: I see nothing warranting deletion. SteveStrummer (talk) 17:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. References (of which there are a few) do seem to give some level of coverage to the topic. Christopher Connor (talk) 01:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * But it is not notable. WP article should be referenced and notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - the sourcing ain't great, but the coverage rises above mere mentions, and is there is enough of it to clear the notability bar for me. -- Whpq (talk) 20:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.