Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communist Youth of Poland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Without prejudice towards a redirect to Progressive Youth of Poland if that article is kept. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  essay  // 04:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Communist Youth of Poland

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No sources are provided to establish notability of this youth organization. An external link verifies their existence, but no evidence is provided for notability. A search in news and scholarly sources in both English and Polish produced no results. Unless multiple, independent sources can be found that discuss this subject in detail, it should be deleted per WP:N. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this group and Progressive Youth of Poland are the same. The name may have changed, same article author. My searches for both don't bring up much and both are listed in some sources as communist groups. There are a few messages from the Progressive Youth here: 1, 2. I don't see the notability of the Communist Youth and would strongly argue the Progressive Youth (already de-PROD'd) be added to this nomination as well.--NortyNort (Holla) 11:21, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Since we're not sure if they're the same group, and since it looks like the might have slightly different notability (I don't know if those links you provided are reliable sources), probably the best thing is to nominate them separately. It won't hurt to have two different AfDs. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:00, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Those links are straight from one of the groups and I wouldn't consider em' notability-establishing. Anyway, agree to delete this article based on my research for notability.--NortyNort (Holla) 03:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Progressive Youth of Poland. I favor the lowest possible barrier for inclusion of political parties and their youth sections. The Progressive Youth of Poland seems to be an affiliate of the World Federation of Democratic Youth which may well be an indicator of an organization of significant size, despite the current badness of that particular stub article. Carrite (talk) 18:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. I think that we can be pretty sure that Communist Youth of Poland is the same group as Progressive Youth of Poland, as the claimed official web site of the former leads to Postępowa Młodzież Polski (Progressive Youth of Poland), but its url contains "kmp", presumably standing for Komunistyczna Młodzież Polski (Communist Youth of Poland). Phil Bridger (talk) 13:22, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Then I'll go ahead and AfD that one on the same grounds. I think it's too late to combine them.  Qwyrxian (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge per redirect proposals. KMP1917 does not seem to be too notable. Its ononline presence is here - a forum with 5 posts... and yes, the forum confirms that KMP1917 = PMP. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 17:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't think merge suggestions are a good idea, because the other page is also up for deletion and I don't see it likely that that will be kept, either. Since neither page has any proof of notability, I don't see how either can be kept. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of any indication of notability. If the other article is kept, a redirect can be created.  Sandstein   05:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.