Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Based Program Design


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep per WP:SK. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 11:50, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Community Based Program Design

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability concerns. Laun chba  ller  09:31, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Launchballer, can you be more specific? Notability concerns is rather vague. Umich hudsonmh (talk) 15:48, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't believe it meets WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.-- Laun  chba  ller  15:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * This article is consistent with WP:GNG and WP:NCORP guidelines because the article relies on significant coverage of credible, independent and third party sources for support. Umich hudsonmh (talk) 16:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Launchballer, thank you. I'd've thought there wasn't enough there to pass. That said, I spotted when I was removing some whitespace - what is that supposed to mean?--  Laun  chba  ller  16:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)


 * KEEP - Thee template says " course assignment | course = Education Program:University of Michigan/Social Work Practice with Community and Social Systems (Winter 2014) | term = 2013 Q3" And Whether you agree with notability or not, this is a course assignment from the University of Michigan.  It should not be deleted. — Maile  (talk) 00:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I was wondering what that was. I assumed that because of the |term=2013 Q3, it was part of an assignment from last year that hadn't been improved very well. I'm happy to withdraw.-- Laun  chba  ller  07:17, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * , if you're withdrawing can you make it more clear by bolding the word or, preferably, putting a short note below your nom? I was looking over the entry and I wasn't sure what you meant. czar ♔  05:03, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I cannot see how I could have been any less ambiguous than 'I am happy to withdraw', but as you wish, I have bolded it.-- Laun  chba  ller  07:18, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.