Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Service The Movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. L Faraone  08:46, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Community Service The Movie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable per WP:NFILM. Ahecht ( TALK PAGE ) 21:37, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Full disclosure, I just blocked the original editor as a promotional username. In any case, I can't find anything to show that this movie is ultimately notable enough for an entry. I remember coming across this on Kickstarter last year and doing a little bit of research on it in the hopes of finding coverage to make an article because well, quite frankly I love being able to make articles for indie films. I wasn't able to find any reviews in reliable sources and I couldn't really find anything to actually back up the claimed awards that wasn't a primary source for the director/crew. Not even the official websites for the various festivals had the film or the director on the awards lists, at least for the ones that had them listed. I did look to see if I could find anything now, and the only thing I can actually find are news stories about alleged extortion attempts- not exactly what I think that this director wants associated with his films. Unfortunately that's really the only stuff I was able to find and not something I'd really use to keep the article with, even if we could keep it on that source alone. (Which thankfully, we can't.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Changing to weak keep per sources found per SCHMIDT. It'll likely need to be watched to ensure it doesn't go promotional again, but the news coverage about the controversy paired with the review is just enough in my opinion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep per Film Threat review, and others less RS. showing a genre cult interest. Sorry Tokyogirl79, but I think we sometimes use different search buttons. .  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:55, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey, I'm less convinced it's a search button and more convinced that you have magical powers over the Internet. XD Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - I looked and couldn't find anything but the sources Schmidt found get it over the line, I think. Editor has now been formally warned about his use of magical powers. Ha ha.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 00:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.