Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comodo Antivirus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ‑Scottywong | prattle _ 22:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Comodo Antivirus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A very badly written content fork of Comodo Internet Security with ad hoc copy and paste of contents, which is copyright violation. ("Comodo Antivirus" and "Comodo Internet Security" are two different brands for the same thing. Advertising tactics, you know.) Codename Lisa (talk) 19:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. It might look like a a content fork, but the news article thing can be fixed. Also, you can get the antivirus by itself on their website.


 * — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMachine03 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 25 July 2014‎ (UTC)
 * Not true. The link ultimately gives a copy of CIS. Also, if you want to fix anything, fix the original article. Content forks are deleted. Best regards, 03:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per OP. There is no reason for this content fork to be a separate article. --Larry (talk) 22:12, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons stated by the op. There is not a single citation in the document itself and the reference list is wholey inadequite.--Klingon1956 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.132.208.201 (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, on the condition they improve the sourcing". Comodo's Antivirus first became noteworthy as a standalone product and many continue to use it as such. However, the writing and sourcing must be improved. UKAmerican — Preceding undated comment added 00:58, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:40, 26 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per OP. There is no reason for this content fork to be a separate article. --Simon the Palmbeachguy
 * Delete the page is being edited from an IP address in Chinai India where comodo has an office. Everything that has been put on the page reeks of bias and is unsupported by references --Simon the Palmbeachguy
 * I am a big fan of Comodo security, but Palmbeachguy is right. I am very disappointed in Comodod for this. None of the other pages for Comodo resemble this. Horrible attempt to introduce a page. If this was by somebody inside Comodo they should be fired. --User:klingon1956 — Preceding undated comment added 18:41, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.