Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Companion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. R e  dwolf24  (talk) 03:40, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Companion
Dicdef. DS 15:59, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow to expand, important topic for Dwarf spheroidal galaxies and featured in the 1911 Encylopedia Britannica. Kappa 16:09, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as it stands. If it evolves into an astronomy article during the Afd then *Keep  as per Kappa  Dlyons493 16:56, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * delete as it stands. an article on the artronomical concept should be at Companion star or Companion galaxy or some such more specific term anyway. DES (talk) 17:39, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dicdef, and not even a good one. TheMadBaron 19:07, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Binary star article exists. WCFrancis 05:12, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. We obviously already have articles on this subject. / Peter Isotalo 05:25, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as duplication of better-named and better-documented content elsewhere. No redirect, unless the word really needs a disambiguation among the term in mythology, the two terms suggested by DES, or other uses of "companion" that might be better suited for Wikipedia than Wiktionary.  Barno 04:27, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. Some of the delete reasons given above are reasons for the article to be marked or, not  or  . ··gracefool |&#9786; 15:47, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.