Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Company D, 2-124 Infantry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to 124th Infantry Regiment (United States). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Company D, 2-124 Infantry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't believe that this company merits its own article and propose deletion or redirecting to 124th Infantry Regiment (United States) Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep delete the "dogs"? current military history. Cramyourspam (talk) 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's an organic company of a larger unit. We do not generally consider these to be independently notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. All I see in the article is a lot of mundane assignment details. The Presidential Unit Citation gave me pause, but I don't see the company listed in the linked document and there are a lot of units there anyway, so it doesn't appear to be as exclusive as I thought. Clarityfiend (talk) 15:35, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 124th Infantry Regiment (United States). Does not appear to be worth a separate article, but battalion would be. &mdash;innotata 17:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * comment (actually a question) Is there a purpose to preserving the article title as a redirect? If there's no content on the subject at the target then the redirect delivers nothing. GraemeLeggett (talk) 17:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to parent organization 124th Infantry Regiment (United States). Subject itself has received passing mention in at least one reliable source, however it does not appear to have received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. Therefore, as per WP:BRANCH, this article should be changed into a redirect to the parent organization.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 20:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to parent regiment, per RCLC. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 21:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect per RCLC --Molestash (talk) 21:43, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 8 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. A redirect is only valuable if someone is likely to search for or link from a term. Is this really likely here? -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:26, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.