Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparable Uncontrolled Price


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Comparable Uncontrolled Price

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This may even qualify as WP:A1; there are no sources here, and no indication why this term (if it actually exists) is important. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 19:10, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This apparently has to do with international economic regulations; but this definition would appear to make the distinction between this concept and the more familiar phrase, fair market value, rather elusive.  There may be a place where this could be merged or redirected to. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:14, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is a technical concept in accountancy and tax regulations, rather than the more general concept of fair market value. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to transfer pricing, where this is already covered more fully and in better context. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This term is not common at all in international economics. Notability not established. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BenOneHundred (talk • contribs) 09:40, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. The term is in fact very common, but in accountancy rather than economics. I suggested redirection above for the purposes of presenting the information to our readers in better context rather than because of any lack of notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:56, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment has since been blocked as a sockpuppet of Mitchronson. / ƒETCH  COMMS  /  00:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Phil; is a common term, but the article itself is wrong. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  00:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.