Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CompareXpress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200  (talk &#124; ctrb) 18:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

CompareXpress

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional piece, no indication of significance. Itsalleasy (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


 * keep meets wp:GNG, nothing promotional here. Duckduckstop (talk) 21:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Please keep. I realize that CompareXpress is not a household name in the United States, but it has received important media recognition in Asia, as the references list demonstrates.--Jpworth3rd (talk) 22:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Please keep. CompareXpress was Singapore's first financial comparison website to launch in 2010. It has strong media followings in Singapore and Thailand.--Roysiew (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 02:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Article appears sourced and is not promotional-enough for it to be an improvement to delete it. CorporateM (Talk) 03:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Just about passes WP:ORG/WP:NWEB. Offline references accepted in good faith. Philg88 ♦talk 07:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.