Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison between Star Trek and Doctor Who

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August &#9742; 20:44, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

Comparison between Star Trek and Doctor Who
Delete because it is original research. Also, many of the comparisons could apply to any two series, and there is some wrong information anyway. khaosworks (talk • contribs) 02:32, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, delete, and delete. We cannot allow people to make up inane comparisons out of the blue on Wikipedia. "Wood is brown! Feces are also brown! yeahwow" --Apostrophe 02:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this and all other comparison articles for being original research. Yes, even similarities between Canada and New Zealand. But then, we voted to keep that. Even though it still doesn't contain any sources. :-P JRM · Talk 02:41, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Ya could always put it back into VfD if you wanted to. --Apostrophe 02:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * No reason to assume the people who voted Keep the last time have seen the light. Trouble is that that comparison debate is at least borderline sourceable, though nobody really cares enough to do it. This one definitely isn't, though. JRM · Talk 03:01, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * High hopes, I suppose. --Apostrophe 03:07, 26 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete- Original Research, and bad research at that Sean 02:44, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Amren (talk)  02:49, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete original research EdwinHJ | Talk 03:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 *  Exterminate Delete. Star Dreck. --WCFrancis 03:23, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jaxl | talk 03:45, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research, plus the two series are so far removed comparing them is pointless. 23skidoo 05:01, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete; Non-encyclopedic | Celcius 05:06, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per khaosworks --TimPope 06:23, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, these are the kind of similarities you get from comparing any two science-fiction shows. None of them interesting and most completely coincidental. Wikipedia articles are NOT lists or repositories of loosely associated topics. - Mgm|(talk) 09:28, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Khaosworks original reasons -- HeyWayne ( Talk • Contributions ) 12:13, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete pointless page Stevelinton 14:17, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or keep, as long as we also get a page detailing 50 reasons why Captain Kirk is better than Captain Picard.
 * Delete. "Both had writers, producers and directors." This stuff is ridiculous. Optichan 20:27, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * A reluctant delete. james gibbon  21:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOR. -Sean Curtin 04:56, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, it might be quite interesting if it was written properly. Doesn't deserve a Wikipedia article, how about as a Projecct StarTrek, Project Doctor Who or User Subpage? --βjweþþ (talk) 12:09, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. *drew 22:50, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-encyclopaedic Drdisque 08:58, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Tenuous and subjective comparison, with little validity here Barneyboo 17:26, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems fairly conclusive, but I'll chime in anyway... --Brian Olsen 03:59, August 29, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Ditto -- Bondegezou 12:05, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.