Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison for Three DVD Rippers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowy delete  --B (talk) 21:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Comparison for Three DVD Rippers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:OR - unreferenced (by definition), spammy (removed EL). Deprodded by original author without improvement.  7   talk   09:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  10:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. ReverendWayne (talk) 13:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research although deprodding without improvement is not in itself justification for deletion Cynical (talk) 20:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. --Sophitessa (talk) 01:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not often one sees such a spectacular WP:OR violation. Recommending WP:SNOW.  Tim Song (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.