Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of 12-13.3 inch subnotebooks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 21:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Comparison of 12-13.3 inch subnotebooks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Comparison of individual products/models. Wikipedia is not a catalog. This is an article that is perpetually out of date (somewhat relevant is WP:RECENT). An encyclopedia shouldn't duplicate a consumer electronics retailer's product comparison tool. Also, WP:INDISCRIMINATE as it makes no justification for the 12"-13.3" size range (subnotebook does not declare such a class). Finally, if the point of the list is not to list current models but all 12" - 13.3" subnotebook models, then the problem is much more clearly WP:INDISCRIMINATE. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  20:28, 3 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep I agree that (part of) the list may already be a little out of date. However, many devices can still be attained from 2nd hand websites. The reason the article was made is not so much to list the commercial devices, but to allow people to compare these devices and pick the best (cheapest) option for them so that they can attain useful information trough it (ie via wikipedia). It wasn't made to compare the commercial devices an sich. KVDP (talk) 08:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - to allow people to compare these devices and pick the best (cheapest) option for them so that they can attain useful information trough it (ie via wikipedia) -- specifically violates WP:NOT. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a buying guide or tool for price shopping. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  14:25, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:00, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Inherently non-notable topic.  A list of presently available 13.3 inch subnotebooks will continually be out of date.  -- RoySmith (talk) 03:19, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 20:13, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  01:11, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete inherently out of scope, impossible to maintain and keep current (in fact it looks like it's already out of date). No way this could reasonably be maintained and it's of no encyclopedic value even if it were. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:24, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NOT Secret account 11:55, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.