Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Candy bars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Comparison of Candy bars

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Is the page really necessary? Also, the page is unsourced. Battleaxe9872 Talk 02:00, 10 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOT and WP:NN. A smaller version may be able to find it's home at the Candy bar article, but I am not 100% sure that would even be helpful/needed. --khfan93 01:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Interesting, but Wiki isn't an indiscriminate collection of information.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  04:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  --  N / A  0  04:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This isn't even an article; it's more like a science fair project. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - its not an article, its contains information that is more easily available in multiple other locations (consumer sites, food trade bodies, manufacturers own information, federal and government authorities), and it would be a nightmare to keep accurate/up to date. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:06, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - It is unfortunately original research. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 03:08, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- Yeah, it's pretty well original research, or synth at best. Can we add a sentence to WP:NOT to say, "Wikipedia is not an Excel spreadsheet"? Reyk  YO!  19:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for Rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron.   Snotty Wong   talk 21:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * NOTE The article under discussion here was tagged for Rescue by User:Uncle G in seeking assistance with its improvement. 05:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. At best, this could be moved to List of candy bars by nutritional content, but even that is very questionable.   Snotty Wong   talk 21:40, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as listcruft - essentially unencyclopaedic list, which is indiscriminate and arguably synthesis/OR. Claritas § 18:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Quite a useful topic for those interested, and I easily found a CNN article about this subject. Obviously something like this would've been covered in various places.   D r e a m Focus  07:27, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: original research. Indiscriminate. Not notable. 24.114.232.33 (talk) 15:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.