Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Star Trek crews


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 19:00, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Comparison of Star Trek crews

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fancruft, indiscriminate collection.... Recommend delete Dchall1 21:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - OR that implies the "science officer" job in one series is comparable to that in all the others. Not particularly useful, either - those interested in clumping people together by job can use an infobox (e.g. Template:Enterprise captains) between character articles. --EEMeltonIV 22:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. Beam it away. -- B figura (talk) 03:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, extremely useful information. Oh what the heck, go ahead and delete it. J I P  | Talk 10:28, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Useful? I guess it depends on your point of view, but this is a concise table for separating the many characters from the many progeny of Gene Roddenberry, and it is preferable to having multiple articles about the casting.  Like they say in baseball, you can't tell the players without a scorecard. Mandsford 01:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - "It is useful" is not a compelling reason to retain content. --EEMeltonIV 02:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Response And neither is "It is not useful"... whether it is or is not useful, it's a concise table for sep... well, whatever I said up there. Mandsford 14:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Original research. Even the title implies it. - Dean Wormer 03:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the various reasons above. Rehevkor 14:59, 8 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.