Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of Times New Roman, Times Roman and MgOpen Canonica fonts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 16:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Comparison of Times New Roman, Times Roman and MgOpen Canonica fonts

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:OR, personal observation, and a rather arbitrary choice of encyclopedia topics. No speedy criterion fits, and the author placed a hangon tag so PROD was unlikely to work. Mango juice talk 17:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It doesn't get much more WP:POV and WP:OR than "the MgOpen & the Times Roman are more nice-looking than Times New Roman." shoy  17:50, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Rob T Firefly 18:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong speedy delete per A1 and A7 of Criteria for speedy deletion-- Phoenix 15 18:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Granted, it's original research, so it's not really A7 material, but I think we can ignore all rules here. B figura  (talk) 22:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Obvious OR.--JForget 22:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Snowball in Courier New becoming avalanche in Arial. Mandsford 22:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per everything said above. —  Wen li  (contribs) 01:01, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fontcruft and WP:NPOV violations with the statement about looks of font (Who can tell the difference, I can't). Nate 02:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom OZOO (What?) 16:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. I'll keep my assumption-of-bad-faith comments to myself here.  RFerreira 04:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, too specific topic, original research, possible POV. J I P  | Talk 04:21, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.