Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of behavioral experiment software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:11, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Comparison of behavioral experiment software

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Spam farm for a whole pile of redlinks. Only four articles exist in this WP:INDISCRIMINATE list, and do we need an article comparing three attributes of four apps? Wikishovel (talk) 14:00, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 14:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Wikishovel (talk) 14:01, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:LISTN and WP:NOTGUIDE. And as per nominator only four list entries have articles. Ajf773 (talk) 17:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Only four of those have links to Wikipedia articles, and I don't know if any of those four would pass notability themselves.  D r e a m Focus  18:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete this is nothing but a promotional link farm, not an encyclopedic article. W Nowicki (talk) 00:14, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Undue self-promotion. —PermStrump  ( talk )  00:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.