Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of bladed rotors for HECS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Jake   Wartenberg  21:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Comparison of bladed rotors for HECS

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The table filled with question marks seems unlikely informative or useful Beagel (talk) 08:29, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Unlikely to be helpful with all those question marks or accurate (creator hasn't bothered to contribute in the past 2 or 3 days) and the only sourcing is a dubious Angelfire free hosting site, which hasn't been updated in 9 years.  GraYoshi2x► talk 15:23, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - I agree that the chart at the moments doesn't have much info, but if it is kept it may be improved by the wikipedians, and the filled in article will then have significant value. KVDP (talk) 15:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note; KVDP is the article creator, who seems to be abdicating improving the article. Abductive  (reasoning) 18:35, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - unlike Comparison of ocean wave energy conversion systems (two up in this AfD list) I think there are too many question-marks and too few sources for this to be useful. JohnCD (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:37, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, no changes made to the article since it was nominated. Abductive  (reasoning) 18:04, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Its inside information. Nobody in the world needs to know this. Szzuk (talk) 20:21, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see no use in the fragmented summary on that page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:34, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.