Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of content management systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen&times; &#9742;  21:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Comparison of content management systems
(1) It doesn't really provide much in the way of useful information. (2) Short of duplicating the information on cmsmatrix et al., it is mostly original research. Most of the facts/features are only mentionened here, not on the detail pages. There are no sources to back those claims. (3) It's not the kind of thing you'd expect to find in an encyclopaedia. (4) The article is a spam magnet; I've watched this page a couple of days and seen a pattern: Commercial CMSs are entered here -- with all features claimed to be supported and linked to detail articles which read like s. --Silvestre Zabala 18:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Part original research, part advertising. Crunch 18:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. PJM 18:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The information here that's encyclopedic is available in List of content management systems, and the remainder is feature comparison which is impossible to define properly (i.e., which features should be compared, and how should those features be defined). Ubernostrum 20:03, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons above. Sue Anne 20:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Latinus 21:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Andy 02:01, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 03:42, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ubernostrum. It also appears to be incomplete since there's no reference to Interwoven's solutions. Essexmutant 12:06, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.Argon128 21:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with List of content management systems, original research move to wikisource. --Moravek 19:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * DO NOT Delete - This type of resource is very valuable to newbies trying to figure out the complex and baffling CMS landscape of products.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.