Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of field and ice hockey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Comparison of field and ice hockey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is no need to have articles comparing any two sports. This can be adequately covered in the Hockey article. At the moment, it's empty anyway.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: WP:NOR/WP:SYNTH if there was content, which there isn't. Editor's got something of a history of dubious hockey-related article creations (indeed, I just found another one on his recent contribution list).   Ravenswing   15:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. It might be possible to write a useful article on this subject, but there's nothing here.  If somebody were to stand up and offer to work on this, I could support moving it to draft space.  -- RoySmith (talk) 20:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.