Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of online charity donation services in the United Kingdom (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Comparison of online charity donation services in the United Kingdom
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The list is one big violation of No original research, as it combines primary sources with non-trivial calculations in order to reach implications not stated in any sources - the point of the list is clearly to posit that some of the given sites are better than others.

The title is broad - it's a "comparison" of certain services - but the list very, very specifically covers commission and fee-related figures. It's not a true comparison of the websites, which I would expect to include things like number of visitors per month, amount of money transferred annually etc.

I'm surprised that the previous deletion discussion ended in no consensus. This is a topic with no significant secondary coverage, and the article is a coatrack being used to make a point about how much online donation services take away from their charities. A worthy point, but not one to be made on Wikipedia. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 01:37, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 01:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 01:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 01:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 05:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is not only a big original research fail but practically all the content is to do with fees or monetary costs, a violation of WP:NOTHOWTO as well. Ajf773 (talk) 08:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Interesting as this table is, it is a WP:SYNTH distilling particular features which is not in itself a suitable encyclopaedic topic. AllyD (talk) 09:18, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - original research Spiderone  11:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unless Online charity donation service is notable enough to be given its own article on Wikipedia, I do not see the rationale to have such an article on Wikipedia. —Madrenergictalk 16:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.