Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of open source DVD authoring software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 23:57, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Comparison of open source DVD authoring software

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability failure: Regardless of the fact that this article entirely lacks source, is original research and attempts to promotes an illusion of credibility via weasel words, this article does not discuss its subject at all! While this article is supposed to be a comparison, it is merely an indiscriminate list of insignificant details, which cannot be used to tell how one entry in the article compares to another. Fleet Command (talk) 22:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of nominators arguments. if this was a brand new article, id maybe say keep and allow to develop. each product either needs an article, or references for each fact in the grid. title of article is not very helpful, as this isnt much of a comparison chart.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Usable content has already been merged, so merging is useless. --DanielPharos (talk) 16:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above - unref / OR.  7  01:24, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.