Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of photo gallery software (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  03:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Comparison of photo gallery software
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Perhaps merge and redirect to Comparison of image viewers. Difference between image viewer software and photo galleries not sufficient. The article also doesn't have large list of items or references. Not much improvement from last AfD, merging and redirecting seems to be the best solution IMO. Greatder (talk) 06:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Lists. Greatder (talk) 06:44, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HOWTO, WP:LIST, and WP:SIGCOV. Comparison lists often bump into our rule against "how to" articles. Also, two references do not reach the level of significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 16:57, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Undereferenced, not updated. Marketing bait too. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.