Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of worship presentation software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 13:34, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Comparison of worship presentation software

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This is really just a chart stating which platforms select church software programs are compatible with. And despite what the article says, there is no technical information to be found. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is hardly even a comparison table, let alone an article. It doesn't actually say anything about the software. J I P  &#124; Talk 09:43, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge This is unfit to be independent article for sure. But as piece of Church software it would be well usable.  R eo  ON   |   + + +  13:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Expand I'd be up for merging if it came do that, but I really think that it should be expanded to be more technical and of more use. I remember when I was hunting for software for me church something like this would have been really useful if it compared features across products. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesdlow (talk • contribs) 06:01, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You've not addressed the fundamental question, per content and deletion policy, of where this article can be expanded from. Where are the sources that cover and document this subject?  Please name them.  Uncle G (talk) 22:04, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Comparison articles are almost always deleted.  I can't imagine, to answer Uncle G, that any such sources can be found. Bearian (talk) 21:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.