Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Competitive Advantage – Oklahoma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe deckertalk 18:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Competitive Advantage – Oklahoma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is pure original research. It reads like something written for an economics homework assignment. There are no references that support the use of the phrase that is the article's title. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:52, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. As  says, this article is orginal research and has been tagged as such since the day it was created.  I suppose it's possible that some of this content could be drastically rewritten and repurposed to add detail to Economy of Oklahoma, if someone expresses interest, but it would be virtually a complete restart to do so. --Arxiloxos (talk) 03:09, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. This is an essay probably written for an assignment. The article subject is too specific as well (application to one particular state in one country). I don't see a need to keep this. Anyone wanting specialised topics such as this would probably look up google scholar. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I'm not convinced by the sources and there's still overall questionability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:05, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.