Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Complete Greatest Hits (Foreigner album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Complete Greatest Hits (Foreigner album)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NALBUMS nothing but a track listing, fails notability as most "best of" albums do Alan  -  talk  00:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. In my experience, the conventional wisdom is that an officially released album by a notable band means that the album is notable as well. In this case, the album in question has the additional benefit of having charted at number 80 on the U.S. Billboard 200. I can't find a whole lot in terms of in-depth coverage by reliable sources; here are a couple short reviews by Allmusic and Chart Attack.  Gongshow  Talk 06:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep As per Gongshow's comments and references above. He both presents a case for it to be kept, but a case for it not to be kept. --Fbifriday (talk) 21:16, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Gongshow above. I just added a stub tag to the article, because that's what it really needs. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 09:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Charted, reviewed album by notable band seals the deal for me. Hekerui (talk) 00:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gongshow. --Europe22 (talk) 23:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - per WP:NALBUMS, "In general, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia." No reason this album would not qualify. Rlendog (talk) 00:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep. Another waste of time.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:36, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.